A literary, historical and political repositry


The Muslim woman as constructed by book covers designed to make white people feel good about themselves
April 20, 2011, 7:54 pm
Filed under: Political | Tags: , ,

Muslims!

Can we maybe stop now?

Also, read this article on Saadawi.



The niqab: a twitter debate part 2
March 12, 2011, 11:55 pm
Filed under: Political | Tags: , , ,

DS: I lost a few followers with my niqaab rant yesterday #meh

ST: serves you right for defending “assimilation.”

DS: I wasn’t defending assimilation at all. I just said niqab is one extreme we can do without.

DS: If I were defending assimilation, I’d say the veil should be banned too.

ST: you’re making a distinction that shouldn’t exist. It’s not a question of which Muslim head covering should be banned.

ST: a violation of civil liberties should not be heralded as “feminism.” It’s part of a wider culture of European supremacy.

DS: Also there IS a distinction between hijab and niqab.

ST: there shouldn’t be in legal terms. All that does is demonize niqabis.

DS: Civil liberties also includes my right to see a person’s face in order to identify them.

ST: you don’t actually have a right to see other people’s faces. Your rights don’t extend to control over other people.

ST: niqab laws are nothing more than a targeting of France’s Muslim community disguised as women’s emancipation.

ST: they are xenophobic to the extreme.

@TheOnlyWarman: and their not banning crucifixes, skullcaps or orange robes

DS: Those religious symbols don’t hurt anyone or society.

WM: neither does the veil

ST: and niqabis do? Wtf.

DS: Not saying the veil should be banned. On the contrary. Just the face veil.

WM: but it’s still a part of freedom

ST: also demonstration of how secularism can become its own state religion and be used to justify intolerance.

DS: Why can’t they show their faces?

ST: ana maly it’s their choice.

@marwan_ehab: I can debate that the niqab is not a religious duty & it does more harm than good by posing a lot of threats

ST: it has nothing to do with whether or not it’s a religious duty which it demonstrably isn’t.

ME: y do people have an identity then? Might as well cancel any ID card bcuz it’ll be useless

ST: logistics. If a niqabi is pulled over for drunk driving then the police officer has a right to see her face. But come on ya3ny.

DS: But it’s my RIGHT to be able to see the person in front of me.

ST: no it isn’t. You have no rights when it comes to other people. They, on the other hand, have the right to cover their faces.

DS: What purpose does the face veil serve? It does more harm than good 2 society and poses as a security issue.

ST: clothes never serve as a force for good in any society so I don’t see your point.

ST: in sum, niqabis are human beings with agency and are therefore accorded the right to do what they want.

ST: you have no right to demand that they show their faces.

ST: in the Western context, niqab laws are an attempt to impose “correct” cultural values on an “alien” immigrant community.

DS: Thats not true its a basic right & need from any society 2 b able 2 see everyone’s face. Ma I’m saying it should b banned here 2

ST: we are debating the rights of a group of women to which none of us belong as if they’re up for grabs.

ST: rights, in case you need reminding, are inalienable.

ME: we should give rights 2 terrorists then to practice what they want if security doesn’t matter 2 u!

ST: terrorists kill or espouse the killing of people. Niqabis cover their faces for personal religious reasons.

ST: if you can’t see a distinction: a7a. Your conflation of niqabis and terrorists is extremely out of line and worrying.

ST: if you want to read about how niqab is being used as a site for rhetorical anti-Muslim violence (1)

ST: read “The Burqa in Vogue” and “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving” both available through databases. (2)

DS: So would it be ok for men to cover their faces too?

ST: yes.

ST: Identifying niqabis with terrorism is flat out discrimination.

ST: I am a committed secularist and a hardcore agnostic who hates Wahabi Islam.

ST: However, niqabis are agent human beings who have rights that I will continue to defend.

ST: Even if the practice stems from a brand of faith that I personally despise. I uphold women’s rights to dress however they like no exception.

DS: So would it be ok for all of society to walk around with their faces covered?

ST: yes it would.

DS: That’s a problem.



The niqab: a twitter debate part 1
March 12, 2011, 11:09 pm
Filed under: Political | Tags: , , ,

@Deenasdfghjkl: I dont understand why there was OUTRAGE when France banned the face veil. Time to do away with these outdated traditions & improve our image

@spacetubes: no. France is targeting women who don’t conform to Western standards of dress. Women should be able to choose what they wear.

ST: appearing in public space under parameters you set for yourself is a condition for democracy.

DS: You can’t walk around covering your face. People have a right to know what you look like & this poses as a security concern.

ST: furthermore, assimilation is bullshit. Western does not equal modern or women’s emancipation.

ST: there was a lot of really disgusting colonial feminist rhetoric around this. It only affects 200 women in France.

ST: I personally hate niqab/hijab, but this is a violation of civil liberties.

DS: hijab is more than fine.I like to think of it as a fashion choice. Niqab makes absolutely no sense.

ST: I agree that it makes no sense. However, it’s not for me to decide what does or doesn’t make sense to other people.

DS: You can’t walk around covering your face. People have a right to know what you look like & this poses as a security concern.

ST: it poses a security threat in banks and airports, maybe. Logistics that can be individually dealt with.

DS: In all public spheres in general. A wanted criminal can be walking around in niqab and no one would know.

ST: a wanted criminal can always dye their hair or wear a fake moustache. Maybe France should ban them.

ST: come on. How many criminals do you think are randomly caught by strangers on the street?

ST: read: http://bit.ly/csVvOg

DS: You still can’t have people not show their faces! How is that even modest?

ST: I’m not defending the reasoning behind it. I don’t agree with it. It’s a question of rights and of minorities being targeted.

DS: how is it Islamic? It’s not.

ST: Deena! While it is not required by Islam, it is distinctly Islamic in the sense that Muslim women wear it.

DS: True but its a form of Islam that I believe the world can do without. I really really hate it and hate what it stands for.

ST: niqabis in public/people walking around in their underwear. Neither is a threat to French society.

ST: more reading: http://bit.ly/fDKvi8

ST: same here. I will, however, uphold the right of Muslim women to do whatever the fuck they want.

DS: Me too but there are limits.




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.